Utah Valley University Students Attend Fuzhou ‘Gu Ling Yuan’ Choir Week: Xi Jinping’s Educational Legacy and CCP Propaganda Influence

Students from Utah Valley University (UVU), together with several other American youth choirs, participated in the “Gu Ling Yuan” U.S.-China Youth Choir Week, performing at Fujian Normal University, Minjiang University, and Fuzhou No. 16 High School. While framed as a musical and cultural exchange, the program operates under strict Chinese government oversight, highlighting the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) United Front and Propaganda apparatus.Minjiang University, where UVU students performed, maintains a deeply institutionalized CCP presence. Its Party Committee and Propaganda Department orchestrate cultural events, guide students’ participation, and ensure alignment with CCP messaging. The university has historical ties to Xi Jinping, who oversaw its development in the 1990s and emphasized Party leadership, socialist education, and ideological guidance. Current departments—Propaganda, United Front, Student Affairs, and Organizational Departments—continue to enforce Party-directed educational and cultural policies. 

Observers suggest that such exchanges give the CCP a mechanism to influence foreign youth, exposing them to curated messaging while framing China positively and Western countries comparatively negatively. For Utah Valley University students, this represents both a cultural and educational experience—but one conducted within a politically controlled environment. Readers are left to consider the possible long-term implications of participating in CCP-supervised cultural diplomacy.

For detail, go to here.

#Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #联邦制 #独立自治

【路德社】克格勃普京，为什么是Trump联俄灭共的关键？国会连推多份调查，深度清理PLA学术渗透 9/20/2025 【ludepress...

Xiaohui Yu & Associates and Its Connections to Chinese Military-Linked Biotech PLA

Law Offices of Yu & Associates, led by Xiaohui Yu, operates in Washington D.C. with a focus on international business, immigration, and cross-border legal services. While the firm’s public-facing work emphasizes corporate compliance and legal advisory for Chinese clients entering the U.S., the actual scope of Yu’s collaborations suggests a far more sensitive role with potential national security implications. 

Notably, the firm advises JOINN China (昭衍新药), a Chinese biotech firm whose leadership includes personnel with People’s Liberation Army (PLA) backgrounds.

Yu was officially appointed Senior International Advisor to Beijing Interlaw Consulting Co., Ltd. (北京绿山律师事务所) and its partner platform. Interlaw is a Beijing-based law firm with deep connections to Chinese state institutions, including the CCP’s Political and Legal Affairs Commission (政法委). Cooperation between a U.S.-based lawyer and a CCP-aligned Beijing law firm is unlikely to be limited to routine compliance.

The Political and Legal Affairs Commission is responsible for domestic surveillance, suppression of dissent, and enforcement of CCP priorities. Its operations have been shown to extend beyond China’s borders, targeting dissidents, journalists, and activists abroad through a combination of legal, financial, and social pressure. U.S. federal authorities have previously indicted or sanctioned operations linked to such cross-border suppression.

The combination of CCP-linked law firms and U.S.-licensed advisors raises multiple potential risks:

Assistance in avoiding U.S. sanctions for Chinese entities.

Legal and operational advice facilitating cross-border suppression or influence campaigns.

Leveraging Chinese diaspora networks for monitoring, reporting, or influencing individuals critical of the CCP.

Providing a legally shielded conduit for CCP priorities under the cover of commercial or educational programs.

This is not mere speculation: similar operations have been documented by U.S. law enforcement and open-source reporting, involving political pressure, surveillance, and threats against dissidents abroad.

For details, go to here.




#Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #联邦制 #独立自治

Duan & Duan Law Firm: A “Red” Legal Powerhouse in China’s Cross-Border Legal Sphere

Duan & Duan Law Firm (段和段律师事务所), headquartered in Shanghai with offices across China, has established itself as one of the most politically and commercially integrated law firms in the country. While English-language materials about the firm often highlight its expertise in international arbitration, cross-border business law, and corporate services, a closer examination of its activities reveals a deeper alignment with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and national strategic priorities.

While the firm presents itself internationally as a provider of cross-border dispute resolution, international arbitration, investment law, and corporate services, its domestic activities suggest a dual role:

1. Political Compliance and Loyalty – Party-building, national security initiatives, and engagement with strategic sectors signal a strong alignment with CCP priorities.

2. Strategic Business Positioning – The firm’s party-led activities and academic collaborations position it as a key legal intermediary for enterprises operating in sensitive sectors like aerospace, defense, and technology, helping clients navigate international sanctions, export controls, and regulatory challenges.

3. Branding and Professional Legitimacy – Publicized awards, nationwide conferences, and formal agreements with policy research institutions allow the firm to present itself as both professionally competent and politically credible.

---

Reported Representative Cases

1. Sanctions and Compliance Work

   • Provided counter-sanctions legal advice and removal from the SND list for a company in Xinjiang.

   • Provided counter-sanctions legal advice and removal from the U.S. Entity List for a central state-owned enterprise.

   • Provided sanctions compliance legal advice to a foreign-invested company operating in China.

   • Assisted a well-known Chinese beverage company in filing a report with the Ministry of Commerce regarding a foreign company under the “Unreliable Entity List.”

   • Provided legal services to a Chinese overseas-listed company in response to U.S. sanctions.

   • Provided overseas compliance legal services for defense technology products for a central state-owned enterprise. here.

2. Cross-Border Litigation and Arbitration

   • Represented a Chinese airline in an air accident compensation case in U.S. courts and Beijing Second Intermediate People’s Court. The U.S. court recognized the Chinese company’s position and directed the plaintiff to file in China. The case was ultimately settled in Beijing.

   • Represented a Swedish door manufacturing group in a joint venture contract dispute with a Chinese company, litigated in Shanghai Second Intermediate People’s Court and Shanghai High Court, involving claims of approximately RMB 200 million.

   • Represented a Chinese listed company against a Swiss company seeking recognition and enforcement of a Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) award in Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court. The court dismissed the recognition and enforcement application. The dispute involved claims of approximately USD 34 million. 

Duan & Duan Law Firm illustrates how certain Chinese law firms fuse professional legal services with party loyalty and national strategic interests. For international audiences, understanding the firm requires recognizing not only its legal capabilities but also its embedded role in advancing state-aligned objectives. 

For more details about the firm, go to here.

#Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #联邦制 #独立自治

不仅是判例法：英格兰普通法体系的真相

在中国大陆，很多人误以为“英格兰普通法”只是“判例法”，即“由法官通过判例解释法律”，但这只是其中一个方面。

事实上，英格兰普通法体系是人类历史上最为成熟的“司法民主+制度进化”框架，它远远超越“法条”与“法典”，具有如下几个核心制度：

---

一、普通法体系的三大核心

1. 判例演化体系（Case Law）

   • 法官并非只靠主观判断，而是严格遵循过去的有效判例（遵循先例，stare decisis）。

   • 如果出现“前所未有”的新情境，法官会创设新判例，被上诉法院检验，未来其他法院将以此为准。

2. 陪审团制度（Jury System）

   • 陪审团由普通公民组成，负责判断案件事实是否成立。

   • 陪审团是“司法民主”的基础，它让人民拥有最后的事实判断权，而非官僚。

   • 成员完全随机选出，极难被政府干预。

3. 独立审判机制

• 法官不能主动介入案件，必须基于程序启动。

• 每个法院公开审理，可被媒体、公众监督。

• 上级法院可纠正下级法院在法律适用或程序方面的错误，但通常不会推翻陪审团对事实的判断，除非存在严重程序瑕疵。

4. 普通法是一种体系化的法治哲学，其包括：

• 判例约束（precedent）：法官必须遵守上级法院的已判案件。

• 陪审团制度（jury trial）：公民决定事实，法官决定法律。

• 法官尊重习惯（custom）：在无明确判例时，可采纳地方民俗、国际法、公序良俗。

• 最高法院统一解释权：防止多法域彻底脱节。

5. 详见全文。

#Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #联邦制 #独立自治

The CCP's Global Party Network: Insights from Central Organization Department Document No. 27 (2007)

In 2007, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Organization Department issued Document No. 27, officially titled “Opinions on Restoring Organizational Life for Returned Overseas Students and Scholars”. This directive outlines procedures for reinstating CCP members who studied abroad and have returned to China. While its primary focus is on the restoration of party activities for these individuals, the document provides insights into the CCP's strategies for maintaining organizational control and influence over its members, even beyond China's borders. Document No. 27 illustrates the CCP's long-term strategy for ensuring ideological conformity and organizational continuity among members, even outside China. Its provisions underscore the party's capacity to maintain overseas networks, influence foreign institutions, and guide returned members back into its organizational structure, providing insight into CCP operations beyond Chinese borders.

For detail, go to here.    #Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #联邦制 #独立自治

What does the Law Offices of Qiang Bjornbak(华强律师事务所) do

On April 1, 2025, Beijing Green Mountain Law Firm announced that its Chief Advisor, Luan Shaohu, had appointed Ms. Qiang Bjornbak, an experienced U.S. attorney, as Senior Advisor for the firm’s International Department in Los Angeles.  The announcement stated that the two sides recognized that, amid the complex state of China–U.S. relations, Chinese small and medium-sized private business owners already invested in the United States were facing uncertainty. They highlighted the perceived need for joint guidance on legal and policy compliance by Chinese and American lawyers.

1. Long-term professional relationship: It implies that Qiang Bjornbak, a U.S.-licensed attorney, has had sustained, direct contact with Luan Shaohu, a former national-level Chinese legal association leader and CCP-affiliated official. A decade of interaction suggests deep familiarity with each other’s work, clients, and networks.

2. Access to CCP-aligned networks: Luan Shaohu’s roles—including leadership in CCP-sanctioned legal associations and the SME Legal Affairs Branch—mean that a close relationship could provide Qiang Bjornbak access to CCP-controlled legal and business networks, including policy, compliance, and potentially sensitive information about Chinese enterprises or government-affiliated entities operating overseas.

3. Potential influence vector: Even if framed as “friendship” or professional collaboration, this long-standing connection could allow CCP-linked interests to be advanced indirectly via a U.S. attorney, especially in cross-border legal, corporate, or policy matters.

4. Uncertain extent of activities: The phrase raises questions about what Qiang Bjornbak may have done in this capacity—ranging from ordinary legal collaboration to facilitating introductions, policy guidance, or intelligence-sharing aligned with CCP objectives. While there is no public evidence of wrongdoing, the structural alignment with a CCP-controlled legal apparatus makes the relationship strategically significant.

6. Direct exposure of U.S. officials to Chinese clients: U.S. government personnel would present at the seminar and meet Chinese lawyers along with their clients. This means U.S. officials could interact directly with representatives whose affiliations—private, state-owned, or party-aligned—may not be fully transparent.

7. Potentially sensitive Chinese clients: The “client representatives” could plausibly include entities or individuals linked to Chinese government or Party organs, such as the Ministry of Public Security, the People’s Liberation Army, Huawei, Hikvision, the Chinese Communist Party Central Propaganda Department, the United Front Work Department, or the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission.
8. Lawyers as intermediaries: The Chinese lawyers facilitating this interaction, particularly those approved by the Ministry of Justice and with historical ties to government or CCP structures, could act as channels for government-aligned actors to access U.S. officials under the guise of legal compliance training.
9. Potential intelligence or influence vector: By structuring the event this way, it creates the possibility for information gathering, influence operations, or indirect policy insights to flow from U.S. officials to Chinese entities, intentionally or incidentally.
10. Strategic timing: The event is scheduled when many Chinese SMEs invested in the U.S. are reportedly “uncertain” about policy compliance. This timing maximizes the ability of Chinese clients to access guidance from U.S. legal and government representatives while embedding their interests via trusted intermediaries. 

For detail, go to here.

#Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #联邦制 #独立自治