All men are endowed by their Creator with unalienable Right of Liberty.自由是造物主赋予人类的不可剥夺的权利

If Mandarin of China were not imposed in Sichuan by CCP's central government, and the local population placed a strong emphasis on cooperating with the US and improving their English skills, several potential outcomes could benefit companies like Intel in terms of talent acquisition and product development. Here are some considerations: 1. Increased Talent Pool Higher English Proficiency: A focus on improving English skills would create a workforce that can communicate effectively with international partners, including tech companies like Intel. This would facilitate collaboration and innovation. Attracting Global Talent: An emphasis on English education and international cooperation could make Sichuan a more attractive location for foreign professionals, increasing the diversity of thought and expertise in the region. 2. Enhanced Collaboration Access to International Standards: Improved English proficiency could enable Sichuanish engineers and developers to access global research,...

A 6-year-old in Sichuan bursts into tears for "not speaking Mandarin well enough." 🇨🇳 CCP forces children to abandon native language—Sichuanish—in favor of state-mandated conformity. This is not education. It’s cultural erasure. #Sichuanish #LanguageRights https://t.co/2ZeWSdh878 — CPA Jim (@CPAJim2021) June 5, 2025   Abstract The language known colloquially as “Sichuanese” has long been misclassified as a sub-dialect of “Chinese,” an ethnolinguistic framework that denies the historical, cultural, and political identity of the Sichuanish people. This paper argues for the adoption of “Sichuanish” as the standard English term for 四川话, aligning with global naming conventions (English, Spanish, Polish) and supporting de-Sinicization of regional identities under authoritarian rule. 1. Naming Matters: -ese vs. -ish Linguistic terms ending in -ese (e.g. Chinese, Cantonese) have historically denoted derivative or colonial characterizations , often imposed externally. By c...

The article published on June 2, 2025, by creaders.net and other websites, likely all paid by Chinese Communist Party through an intermediary or intermediaries that infiltrate dissident groups or cryptocurrencies, or relying on monetary sources controlled or influenced by CCP , titled "中联办异动 中南海权力生变？！爆汪洋秘密代理总书记职权," claims a dramatic power shift within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), alleging that Xi Jinping has been absent for over a week, that Wang Yang is secretly acting as General Secretary, and that the sudden dismissal of Zheng Yanxiong as Hong Kong Liaison Office director signals a broader reconfiguration in Zhongnanhai. Sourced primarily from unverified self-media and speculative commentary, the article lacks credible evidence and misrepresents CCP power dynamics. When analyzed through Leninist organizational principles, recent U.S.-China trade tensions, and the systemic risks posed by the CCP’s authoritarian structure, the article’s weaknesses become glaring. It fa...

  Abstract: This report investigates the systemic nondisclosure of material related-party transactions by five major Chinese state-owned banks, despite claiming compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), specifically International Accounting Standard 24 (IAS 24) on Related Party Disclosures. It focuses on undisclosed loans to China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd (CSCEC), an entity directly controlled by the State Council of the People's Republic of China (PRC), through the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC). Data is drawn from publicly available 2019 annual reports and CSCEC’s 2019 bond prospectus, all of which are verifiable from stock exchange websites and official bank investor relations portals. 1. Introduction The People's Republic of China operates a state-capitalist financial system dominated by large state-owned commercial banks and centrally controlled enterprises. Despite listing their secur...

1. No More One-Party Tyranny, No More One Nation The idea of "One China" is not historical—it’s a CCP myth of domination . In the new world: Tibet , Uyghurstan , Southern Mongolia , Hong Kong , Taiwan , Hakka , Canton , Min , Sichuan , Jiangnan , Yunnan , and more will become sovereign nations . Each nation sets its own language, laws, values , and does not answer to any Mandarin-speaking “center”. No federal system to bind them together— only trade, diplomacy, and mutual respect . 🕊️2. Nations Without Armies—A Demilitarized Civilization Instead of building another Asian arms race: All newly born nations agree to constitutional demilitarization —no standing armies, no nukes, no paramilitaries. The US military or NATO-like security guarantees are invited voluntarily under treaty, just as: Iceland has no army and relies on NATO, Japan and Germany rely on US Forces under clear constitutional limits. This prevents any future authoritarian military ...

Executive Summary Tian Jun, born in 1957, presents a highly illustrative case of how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has systematically groomed cadres through military-industrial structures and then deployed them abroad as part of long-term influence and intelligence efforts. From his early roots in a PLA-controlled weapons factory to his prominent roles in the UK’s financial and energy sectors, Tian’s career arc raises substantial concerns for Western counterintelligence and policy planners. Timeline and Background Pre-1978 : Tian Jun worked as an apprentice at “Factory 6410,” a military industrial complex located in the remote Taihang mountain region, specifically in Jingxing County. This facility, a massive enterprise directly under the PLA Armored Forces and rated as a full division-level unit, was considered a model of red-military industry integration. Tian himself stated that his aspiration at the time was to one day live in the factory’s “Generals’ Building.” 1978 : On Septem...

Context of the Trade Deal Violation On May 30, 2025, Trump posted on Truth Social, accusing China of violating a trade agreement made two weeks earlier, which involved a 90-day suspension of high tariffs (U.S. tariffs reduced from 145% to 30%, China’s from 125% to 10%) to allow negotiations. Trump claimed China’s violation stemmed from slow compliance, particularly in issuing export licenses for rare-earth minerals, critical for industries like automotive and electronics. He responded by doubling U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs globally to 50% and issued a veiled threat of further action against China, though specifics were unclear. A U.S. official noted China’s delay in rare-earth export licenses could disrupt supply chains, potentially forcing factory closures within weeks. Impact on Chinese Stocks The alleged violation and Trump’s response have introduced volatility, which could affect Chinese stocks, particularly in export-oriented sectors like technology, manufacturing, and mater...