What does the Law Offices of Qiang Bjornbak(华强律师事务所) do

On April 1, 2025, Beijing Green Mountain Law Firm announced that its Chief Advisor, Luan Shaohu, had appointed Ms. Qiang Bjornbak, an experienced U.S. attorney, as Senior Advisor for the firm’s International Department in Los Angeles.  The announcement stated that the two sides recognized that, amid the complex state of China–U.S. relations, Chinese small and medium-sized private business owners already invested in the United States were facing uncertainty. They highlighted the perceived need for joint guidance on legal and policy compliance by Chinese and American lawyers.

1. Long-term professional relationship: It implies that Qiang Bjornbak, a U.S.-licensed attorney, has had sustained, direct contact with Luan Shaohu, a former national-level Chinese legal association leader and CCP-affiliated official. A decade of interaction suggests deep familiarity with each other’s work, clients, and networks.

2. Access to CCP-aligned networks: Luan Shaohu’s roles—including leadership in CCP-sanctioned legal associations and the SME Legal Affairs Branch—mean that a close relationship could provide Qiang Bjornbak access to CCP-controlled legal and business networks, including policy, compliance, and potentially sensitive information about Chinese enterprises or government-affiliated entities operating overseas.

3. Potential influence vector: Even if framed as “friendship” or professional collaboration, this long-standing connection could allow CCP-linked interests to be advanced indirectly via a U.S. attorney, especially in cross-border legal, corporate, or policy matters.

4. Uncertain extent of activities: The phrase raises questions about what Qiang Bjornbak may have done in this capacity—ranging from ordinary legal collaboration to facilitating introductions, policy guidance, or intelligence-sharing aligned with CCP objectives. While there is no public evidence of wrongdoing, the structural alignment with a CCP-controlled legal apparatus makes the relationship strategically significant.

6. Direct exposure of U.S. officials to Chinese clients: U.S. government personnel would present at the seminar and meet Chinese lawyers along with their clients. This means U.S. officials could interact directly with representatives whose affiliations—private, state-owned, or party-aligned—may not be fully transparent.

7. Potentially sensitive Chinese clients: The “client representatives” could plausibly include entities or individuals linked to Chinese government or Party organs, such as the Ministry of Public Security, the People’s Liberation Army, Huawei, Hikvision, the Chinese Communist Party Central Propaganda Department, the United Front Work Department, or the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission.
8. Lawyers as intermediaries: The Chinese lawyers facilitating this interaction, particularly those approved by the Ministry of Justice and with historical ties to government or CCP structures, could act as channels for government-aligned actors to access U.S. officials under the guise of legal compliance training.
9. Potential intelligence or influence vector: By structuring the event this way, it creates the possibility for information gathering, influence operations, or indirect policy insights to flow from U.S. officials to Chinese entities, intentionally or incidentally.
10. Strategic timing: The event is scheduled when many Chinese SMEs invested in the U.S. are reportedly “uncertain” about policy compliance. This timing maximizes the ability of Chinese clients to access guidance from U.S. legal and government representatives while embedding their interests via trusted intermediaries. 

For detail, go to here.

#Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #联邦制 #独立自治