被控制的自由派:冯崇义如何成为北京的完美代言人
2017年,悉尼科技大学(UTS)副教授、杨恒均博士导师冯崇义成为一场高度政治化事件的中心。冯崇义被天津国安局以“危害国家安全”名义限制出境,滞留广州期间每天接受五小时约谈。获释条件是签署声明,承诺不对外泄露讯问细节或地点。
This episode marked Feng as a “controlled liberal”—someone whose personal freedom and professional credibility were intact, but who was now a monitored conduit for politically sensitive information. Years later, when Yang Hengjun’s prison correspondence letter to Australian Prime Minister Albanese was publicly disclosed, it was Feng who transmitted the letter, ensuring it passed both Beijing’s implicit approval and Western media’s scrutiny.
这一事件标志着冯崇义成为一个**“被控制的自由派”——个人自由和学术身份看似完整,但已成为受监控的政治信息通道**。多年后,当杨恒均致澳大利亚总理阿尔巴尼斯的狱中书信公开时,正是冯崇义提供了传递渠道,确保信件既符合北京的暗中审批,也能通过西方媒体的审查。
Feng’s role was far from purely academic. He is known for his admiration of Wen Jiabao, and he reportedly had indirect connections to Peng Liyuan and the PLA Military Medical Academy, as well as direct links to at least two PLA personnel, one holding the rank of Senior Colonel. His academic and personal credibility provided a credible veneer, allowing sensitive content—like Yang Hengjun’s gratitude towards the Chinese government from prison—to appear as a personal, voluntary expression rather than a controlled narrative.
冯崇义的角色绝非纯粹学术。他以崇拜温家宝闻名,据报道与彭丽媛及中国人民解放军军事医学科学院存在间接关联,并与至少两名解放军军人能直接关联,其中一人为陆军大校。他的学术与个人信誉提供了可信外衣,使得诸如杨恒均从狱中表达对中国政府感激之类敏感内容,看起来像是个人自愿表达,而非政治操控的产物。
This combination of overseas academic credibility, political oversight, and prison correspondence illustrates a sophisticated Beijing strategy: using ostensibly independent actors to project influence, control narrative, and shape international perception. Feng Chongyi exemplifies how a “controlled liberal” can become the perfect messenger, bridging the gap between a monitored domestic system and the global academic and media landscape.
No comments:
Post a Comment