中国科学院武汉病毒研究所于2024年3月1日发布的2020年度部门决算报告,原始链接(https://whiov.cas.cn/xxgk_160268/xxgk2023/202312/P020240301599632280960.pdf)的内容已经被删除。
All men are endowed by their Creator with unalienable Right of Liberty. Welcome to follow @CPAJim2021 on X or Twitter,a platform seriously restricted in China. https://twitter.com/CPAJim2021
中国科学院武汉病毒研究所2020年度部门决算报告2020 Annual Financial Report of Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
北京军区联勤部和服务于中国共产党的核生化战争计划的中国人民解放军军事医学科学院发表的“病原微生物实验室实验操作产生气溶胶风险定量研究”论文
北京军区联勤部和服务于中国共产党的核生化战争计划的中国人民解放军军事医学科学院发表的“病原微生物实验室实验操作产生气溶胶风险定量研究”论文
The paper "Risk quantification of microbiological aerosol generated by experimental operations in pathogenic microbiology labs" published by the Joint Logistics Department of the Beijing Military Command and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, which serves the atomic or nuclear, biological and chemical(ABC) warfare plan of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP).
Chinese Communist Party tried to cover up problems of quality, corruption and flaws in relation to T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) resulting in casualties in target shooting test in Bangladesh
Li-Meng Yan and Lude Media revealed that Chinese Communist Party tried to cover up problems of quality, corruption and flaws in relation to T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) resulting in casualties in target shooting test in Bangladesh.
It is claimed by Dr Li-Meng YAN that they just obtained a top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from Central Military Commission of Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
On 5 May 2024, The newly delivered T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) to Bangladesh were tested in Chattogram for target shooting, resulting in casualties. The CCP and Bangladeshi militaries strictly blocked the news, involving the CCP's large-scale corruption of the military of the Belt and Road countries. Experts of People's Republic of China (PRC) are going to blame Pakistan-made ammunition for the accident, and cover-up the fatal flaws of Chinese T-59G tanks.
Here is the CCP's report translated by Dr Li-Meng Yan, with original contents in Chinese of Lude Media.
- On 5th May 2024, the expert team for Bangladesh T-59G tanks received a notice from the Bangladesh 902 workshop that during the tank shooting process, a personnel accident occurred in the Seventh Regiment of Bangladesh using the T-59G tanks delivered by us. The commander of one of the tanks, and a gunner suffered burns and one loader died.- Our expert team immediately reported to the relevant departments. On May 6, after receiving a notice from Bangladesh, the expert team and CCP’s Central Military Commission representative office, together with personnel from the Bangladesh Armor Bureau, took the flight to go to the Chittagong accident site.
On May 7, the Chinese on-site accident investigation team learned and reported the following situation:EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
We just obtained a top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 Central Military Commission.
1-n)
• On May 5, The newly delivered T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) to Bangladesh were… https://t.co/kdmuZ5Q18f pic.twitter.com/UJAKslQLdH
1. The accident vehicle number is 260198. The vehicle is one of the fourth batch of vehicles recently delivered to Bangladesh (the fourth batch was delivered from March to April 2024, with a total of 30 tanks delivered to the foreign customer. - The vehicles were successively delivered to the troops for use in full compliance with the acceptance technical requirements.
- One of the users, the 7th Bangladesh Regiment, followed the original plan and immediately went to Chittagong for target practice after picking up four newly delivered tanks in early May).
- The vehicle fired a total of 60 rounds of ammunition before the accident.
1.1 Among them, 30 rounds of ammunition were fired during the tank acceptance (22 rounds armor-piercing, 7 rounds grenade, and 1 round high-explosive anti-tank. All ammunition types were supplied by us and passed the target shooting test).
1.2 The remaining 30 rounds were fired from May 1 to 4, all of which were armor-piercing rounds. The accidental ammunition was the 31st armor-piercing round fired this time and the fifth round fired that day.
- All ammunition for this shooting was produced by POF of Pakistan. Production date in 2022.
2. The accident occurred at around 2:40 pm on May 4, and operations such as loading ammunition before shooting were normal. The shooting uses the simple working mode and is fired manually.
- After firing, the gunpowder retreated normally, but about 152mm of the retrieval process was not completed, the gun bolt was not opened, and the cartridge case remained in the gun bore. The ammunition was fired forward and fell about 700-800 meters (it failed to reach the target range).
3. According to the description of the soldiers on site, in order to observe the ammunition loading position, Bangladesh side did not install an aluminum alloy protective plate on the right side. In addition, the initial pressure and final pressure of the gun were not checked before shooting.
4. After the shooting, the commander was burned, the gunner was burned, and the right chin of his face was shattered by the bolt body baffle flying out, and the bolt body baffle was deformed; the loader died and was burned, and the left half of his head was shattered by the baffle plate flying out.
- The source of the force that caused the bolt body baffle and gear plate to fly out and injure people cannot be determined at the scene and requires analysis by relevant domestic experts in China.
5. The on-site working group observed the inside of the vehicle body and found basically no traces of fire damage to the interior of the tank.
6. Some of the 125 armor-piercing bullets used by Bangladesh on the vehicle were seen at the scene (Bangladesh purchased them from Pakistan, which is cheaper).
- Except for a few cases of external water accumulation (it just rained on the morning of May 7), the ammunition is in a dry state. Desiccant, ammunition packaging, etc. are in good condition.
Bangladeshi attitude: The Bangladeshi side held an on-site meeting today, led by G1 (codename given by CCP), the first secretary of the Director of the Armor Bureau, CO and some officers of the 7th Regiment, the Chinese working group and our military agents were present.
- At the meeting, G1 stated that the inside of the tank should be a safe space isolated from the gun barrel. It is difficult to accept the casualties inside such a tank, and hoped that China would answer three questions:
1. The cause of the accident
2. Whether accident-related protective measures exist on the vehicle and why they are ineffective
3. Why the re-advancement was not completed.
- In addition, the Bangladeshi side did not complain about the Norinco Company during the entire investigation process. They just felt that the protective design of the Chinese T-59G vehicles was somewhat weak and could not effectively prevent personal injury in a vicious incident.
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
2-n) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
• Here is the 🇨🇳 report translated by me, with original contents in Chinese @lude_media
I. On May 7, the Chinese on-site… pic.twitter.com/fIC0nFyueP
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
3-n) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
III. Technical team work on site in Bangladesh
As soon as the accident occurred, Norinco’s First Department of Military… pic.twitter.com/Js9XQnBl7v
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
4-5) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
IV. Research results of domestic working groups and related manufacturers.
After one day of research, the Chinese domestic… pic.twitter.com/yIi0dqGXKH
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
5-5) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
V. Report on the domestic processing situation in Norinco Company
1. Norinco’s regional department, quality department,… pic.twitter.com/C0aEQtzLVA
这个机密文件内容曝光,事件揭露,震动的是习的中共军委高层内部,他们知道这意味着什么。
— 路德社lude media (@lude_media) May 9, 2024
中共这批59改坦克炮管材料处理技术在西方制裁之后不过关,发射几十发炮弹就变形,导致漏气形成冲击波致死。而中共忽悠孟加拉军方推卸责任说是使用巴基斯坦的廉价炮弹原因。
真是可笑至极。 https://t.co/0oLrddXExp
中共交付孟加拉国的坦克发生严重事故,听起来像是炸膛了!而且没有安装防护板。有可能是火药质量问题,也有可能是火药里被放了炸药!总之我觉得中共的武器质量是不行的。🤣
— James (@JamesCa41543870) May 9, 2024
Le nouveau virus de type Ebola en provenance de la République populaire de Chine est-il une arme biologique ? Opinion de Li-Meng Yan
Le général XIA Xian-Zhu (夏咸柱) du Parti communiste chinois est le principal scientifique du nouveau projet de virus de type Ebola rapporté par . Bien que le général XIA utilise sa position dans les instituts de fusion militaro-civil pour publier des articles maintenant, il est le principal responsable des armes biologiques. expert en zoonoses et immunologie, au 11ème Institut (recherche vétéran) de l'Académie des Sciences Médicales Militaires (AMMS).
XIA est également académicien de l'Académie chinoise d'ingénierie (CAE), qui est le plus haut niveau d'académie de fusion militaro-civile en RPC, tandis qu'une autre est l'Académie chinoise des sciences (CAS). • Les preuves montrent que de nombreux universitaires du CAS et du CAS ont été profondément impliqués dans le développement du virus #COVID19 et dans la guerre de l'information qui y est associée (en particulier les faux récits d'origine naturelle et les données falsifiées).
Quelles autres nouvelles armes biologiques candidates ont été testées dans cette étude ? R : Outre le virus de type Ebola, les chercheurs du CCP-PLA ont également testé de nouveaux virus recombinants en utilisant les protéines GP du virus mortel Soudan et du virus Lassa dans cette étude. Bien que les taux de mortalité des deux autres nouveaux virus ne soient pas aussi « bons » que ceux du virus de type Ebola, cela ne signifie pas qu’ils cesseraient d’« améliorer » les autres virus pour en faire de nouvelles armes biologiques. • Conseils : Taux de létalité de ces virus de la fièvre hémorragique Virus Ebola : 25 à 90 % Virus du Soudan : 53 à 100 % Virus Lasso : 1 à 15 %
La protéine Ebola-GP appliquée dans le nouveau virus armé de la RPC a été étudiée à l'origine par des scientifiques dans le cadre d'un programme d'armes biologiques en Union soviétique dans les années 1990 ! • La protéine Ebola GP conçue dans le nouveau virus mortel de CCP-PLA est une protéine GP complète du virus Ebola (Genbank NO. AF086833.2). • Selon NIH GenBank, la protéine Ebola GP a été étudiée initialement et à plusieurs reprises par un groupe de scientifiques de l'institut des armes biologiques de l'URSS à Koltsovo, en Russie. • L'ancien directeur du projet d'armes biologiques de l'URSS, le Dr Kenneth Alibek, a confirmé que le laboratoire de vecteurs de Koltsovo est très dangereux, car il travaille sur des armes biologiques virales. • Q : POURQUOI les chercheurs du CCP-PLA se concentreraient-ils sur la même protéine Ebola GP ?
Étude du site de clivage de la furine et de la même protéine Ebola GP (Genbank NO. AF086833.2) • Voici quelques articles publiés dans les années 1990 par les chercheurs en armes biologiques de l'ancienne URSS du laboratoire Koltsovo Vector (V E Volchkov, V A Volchkova), liés au même Protéine Ebola-GP (NO. AF086833.2) dans le nouveau virus de type Ebola de la RPC. • Notamment, dans l'article intitulé « Traitement de la glycoprotéine du virus Ebola par la proprotéine convertase furine » en 1998, les chercheurs de l'ancienne URSS et leurs collègues allemands de l'époque se sont concentrés sur les fonctions du site de clivage de la furine (FCS) de cette protéine GP d'Ebola. • « (Ebola) GP est clivé par la proprotéine convertase furine. Ceci a été indiqué par l’observation selon laquelle le clivage ne s’est pas produit lorsque la GP était exprimée dans des cellules LoVo défectueuses en furine, mais qu’elle était restaurée dans ces cellules par la furine exprimée par un vecteur. • Par ailleurs, développer un vaccin est un prétexte courant pour la recherche sur les armes biologiques dans les régimes communistes. • Q : Est-ce une coïncidence si la même protéine Ebola GP est choisie par les experts en armes biologiques du CCP-PLA qui ont fabriqué le virus #COVID19 avec du FCS en laboratoire ?
La nouvelle est rapportée pour la première fois par Li-Meng Yan sur X.
Opinion of Michael Pettis on China's comparative advantage argument
"China denied generating overcapacity and accuses the EU of protectionism. Xi Jinping reiterated that position in talks with Macron, saying there is no capacity issue viewed from the perspective of comparative advantage or global market demand."
Xi is right to argue that overcapacity in any particular industry can simply be an expression of comparative advantage. In a well-functioning global trade environment, countries will indeed "overproduce" those products in which they have a comparative production advantage in order to exchange them for products in which they have a comparative production disadvantage. That causes total global production to rise, and is the main benefit of international trade.
But, as argued in a twitter thread posted five days ago, there are two important points that must be part of the trade discussion. These two points are often conflated, even though they are very separate.
In response to a question on Chinese overcapacity at a press conference, the Foreign Ministry's Lin Jian responded: "The “China overcapacity” accusation may look like an economic discussion, but the truth is, the accusation is built on false logic and ignores more than 200 years of the basic concept of comparative advantage in Western economics. All countries produce and export products of their comparative advantage and this is the nature of international trade." "If a country," he continues, "should be accused of overcapacity and asked to cut capacity whenever it produces more than its domestic demand, then what would countries trade with?" He's partly right. Trade should be based on comparative advantage, which means that countries must indeed produce more than they need of goods in which they have a comparative production advantage in order to exchange them for goods in which they don't. But this argument misses two important points. The first, and most obvious, is that comparative advantage can only be expressed in the exchange of goods. It would matter much less to the world if China were using its export revenues to import from the rest of the world. But it's not. China's competitiveness (very different from comparative advantage) is based on transfers from the household sector that leave Chinese demand too weak to absorb Chinese production. The purpose of China's trade surplus is to shift this weak demand abroad. The second point is that natural or permanent comparative advantage is very rare. In reality countries implement trade and industrial policies in order to create comparative advantage. There's nothing wrong with that. Its the whole point of trade and industrial policies. But this also means that if a country implements trade and industrial policies that create comparative advantage in a strategically important industry, other countries can regain comparative advantage in that industry by implementing their own trade and industrial policies. Lin Jian is right to say that "all countries produce and export products of their comparative advantage and this is the nature of international trade," but this doesn't mean comparative advantage is consistent with running permanent surpluses to resolve weak domestic demand, nor does it mean that other countries cannot implement trade and industrial policies designed to regain comparative advantage in those same industries. Comparative advantage is constantly fought over. That's almost the definition of economic development.
First, comparative advantage is almost always driven by trade and industrial policies designed to help a country dominate strategically important industries. This means it is a dynamic process, and there is no reason why, once it has been achieved by one country, other countries may not also implement similar trade and industrial policies to regain comparative advantage if they too believe the industry is strategically important. That is the whole point of trade and industrial policy.
Second, comparative advantage is expressed in the exchange of goods, and not in their production. Exporting goods without importing isn't an expression of comparative advantage. It is just how countries export excess savings and externalize the costs of weak domestic demand.
Yesterday Ursula von der Leyen said "For trade to be fair, access to each other’s market also needs to be reciprocal." If there weren't the problem of excess savings, access to each other's market would indeed be part of any resolution of trade disputes.
But the overall problem for China's trade partners isn't lack of access. It is China's persistent excess savings, driven by distortions in domestic income distribution. This is what China's trade partners must absorb.
Is The new Ebola-like virus from People's Republic of China a bio-weapon? Opinion of Li-Meng Yan
The new Ebola-like virus from People's Republic of China (PRC) as reported,here, is definitely a new gain-of-function product of Chinese Communist Party's People's Liberation Army (CCP-PLA)’s bioweapon program!It MUST be investigated by international society as soon as possible!
Bioweapon General XIA Xian-Zhu (夏咸柱) of Chinese Communist Party is the principle scientist in the new Ebola-like virus project reported by .• Though General XIA uses his position in military-civil fusion institutes to publish articles now, he is the leading expert on zoonosis diseases and immunology, in the 11th Institute (veteran research) of Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS).
XIA is also an academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), which is the highest level of military-civil fusion academy in PRC, while another one is Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). • Evidence shows that many academicians of CAS and CAS have deeply involved in #COVID19 virus development and the related information war (esp. fake nature-origin narrative and falsified data).
What else novel bioweapon candidates have been tested in this study? A: Besides Ebola-like virus, CCP-PLA researchers also tested new recombinant viruses using GP proteins from lethal Sudan virus and Lassa virus in this study. Though the death rates of the other two new viruses are not as “good” as the Ebola-like virus, it doesn’t mean they would stop “improving” the other viruses to be novel bioweapons. • Tips: Case fatality rates of these hemorrhagic fever viruses Ebola virus: 25-90% Sudan virus: 53-100% Lasso virus: 1-15%
Here.
The Ebola-GP protein applied in the new PRC weaponized virus was originally studied by scientists in bioweapon program in Soviet Union in 1990s! • The Ebola GP protein engineered in CCP-PLA’s new lethal virus is full-length GP from Ebola virus (Genbank NO. AF086833.2). • According to NIH GenBank, Ebola GP protein was initially and repeatedly studied by a group of scientists in the USSR bioweapon institute in Koltsovo, Russia. • Former Director of USSR bioweapon project, Dr. Kenneth Alibek has confirmed that the Koltsovo vector lab is very dangerous, working on virus-bioweapons. • Q: WHY would CCP-PLA researchers focus on the same Ebola GP protein?
Study of Furin Cleavage Site & the same Ebola GP protein (Genbank NO. AF086833.2) • Here are some papers published in 1990s, by the former USSR bioweapon researchers in Koltsovo Vector lab (V E Volchkov, V A Volchkova), related to the same Ebola-GP protein (NO. AF086833.2) in the new PRC's Ebola-like virus. • Notably, in the paper titled “ Processing of the Ebola virus glycoprotein by the proprotein convertase furin” in 1998, the former USSR researchers and their then-colleagues in Germany, focused on functions of Furin Cleavage Site (FCS) of that Ebola GP protein👇🏻 • “(Ebola) GP is cleaved by the proprotein convertase furin. This was indicated by the observation that cleavage did not occur when GP was expressed in furin-defective LoVo cells but that it was restored in these cells by vector-expressed furin.” • BTW, to develop vaccine is a common pretext of bioweapon research in communist regimes. • Q: Is it coincident that the same Ebola GP protein is chosen by CCP-PLA bioweapon experts who made #COVID19 virus with FCS in labs?
Opinions du Dr Li-Meng YAN sur la manière d'enquêter plus en profondeur sur la vérité sur l'origine du COVID-19
“Our inability to know the source of the virus, to me, is the largest intelligence failure since 9/11”. - @Ginkgo CEO @jrkelly on the origins of the coronavirus. pic.twitter.com/LLOu7KoWdU
— Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (@committeeonccp) 7 mars 2024
Voici les opinions de Li-Meng Yan sur la manière d’enquêter plus en profondeur sur la vérité sur l’origine du COVID-19 et d’éviter un tel échec des services de renseignement à l’avenir.
Cependant, 1) DEFUSE a été rejeté par la DARPA. 2) Le site de clivage de la furine (FCS) n'est pas la seule fonction acquise dans le SRAS2 après une modification en laboratoire.3) Le but du développement du SRAS2 n'est PAS le développement d'un vaccin compte tenu des fonctions multi-origines en laboratoire ciblant l'humain dans le SRAS2.
Désormais, les Américains connaissent les liens cachés entre l'Institut de virologie de Wuhan, DEFUSE et des scientifiques américains comme Baric et Daszak. En fait, Dr Li-Meng YAN est le premier virologue à parler des liens et de la corruption entre ces scientifiques américains et les scientifiques du PCC comme Linfa Wang et Zhengli Shi.
En bref, ni ce que Li-Meng YAN a révélé dans les trois rapports Yan sur l'origine du COVID-19, ni les preuves que Li-Meng YAN a montrées d'une autre manière n'ont contredit les documents actuellement connus comme DEFUSE.
Il semble que la plupart des scientifiques ayant des opinions sur l'origine du COVID-19 en laboratoire, ignorant l'importance des CoV ZC45 et ZXC21 des chauves-souris de Zhoushan, soient tombés dans un autre piège de faux récits et de fausses données fabriqués par le Parti Communiste Chinois (PCC). Les faux récits et les fausses données créés par le PCC incluent les ancêtres falsifiés. RaTG13, les virus de type SRAS du pangolin, les virus de chauve-souris du Laos, du Cambodge ou d'autres régions d'Asie du Sud-Est sont des ancêtres falsifiés, comme le prouve le 2e rapport Yan.
Par conséquent, ils doivent continuellement discuter avec les scientifiques zoonotiques sur la base de ces mauvais virus qui n'existent PAS dans la nature, mais oublier les preuves fumantes de ZC45/ZXC21, comme l'explique Li-Meng YAN dans le premier rapport Yan. La stratégie nationale dominante de l'Armée populaire de libération et du PCC Xi en matière d'armes biologiques sans restriction serait dissimulée si le récit du RaTG13 était suivi.
À partir de RaTG13, tous les ancêtres falsifiés sont publiés après révélation de Li-Meng YAN sur le véritable backbone ZC45/ZXC21 le 19 janvier 2020. Li-Meng YAN l'a décrit aux pages 3-4 du 3ème rapport Yan.
Les coronavirus de chauve-souris ZC45 et ZXC21 ont été découverts dans la région de Zhoushan, dans la province du Zhejiang (est de la Chine), par le scientifique militaire Chang-Jun Wang du commandement de Nanjing avec d'autres. Wang a été promu colonel supérieur en 2020.
Après que les ZC45/ZXC21 aient été sauvés avec succès en laboratoire, ils ont été modifiés pour de multiples fonctions améliorées par différentes équipes, notamment des équipes de l'Armée populaire de libération chinoise et de Zhengli Shi.
C’est comme le constructeur automobile, qui peut disposer de nombreux ateliers de pièces et d’assemblage. L'Institut de virologie de Wuhan (WIV) est un « atelier ». Et d'autres équipes sont impliquées, telles que l'Académie des sciences médicales militaires et le laboratoire de l'OMS à HKU où travaillait Li-Meng YAN, ainsi que des laboratoires basés à l'étranger. Puisqu’il s’agit d’un projet confidentiel, il n’existe aucune trace publique à ce sujet dans WIV ou dans les laboratoires associés.
Pendant des décennies, le PCC a implanté des agents universitaires dans le domaine des maladies infectieuses pour obtenir/voler les technologies avancées des États-Unis et d'autres pays, et les encourager à « tenir la voix » dans ce domaine.
Pour obtenir de l'argent du gouvernement de l'Institut National de la Santé ou du Département de la Défense des États-Unis. Mais ce n'est pas une question d'argent (le PCC a investi beaucoup plus d'argent dans cette stratégie nationale), mais d'impacts et de réseau internationaux.
Par exemple, Linfa Wang est un agent du PCC, et Baric et Daszak sont des idiots utiles. (Il est possible que le PCC ait également implanté des agents académiques dans le domaine des maladies infectieuses pour obtenir/voler les technologies avancées de France).Pour en savoir plus sur l'actualité de la Chine en français, veuillez suivre le CPA Jim @CPAJim2021 sur X.