All men are endowed by their Creator with unalienable Right of Liberty. Welcome to follow @CPAJim2021 on X or Twitter,a platform seriously restricted in China. https://twitter.com/CPAJim2021
中共国财政部、司法部联合印发的《关于政府采购支持监狱企业发展有关问题的通知》
中华人民共和国财政部、司法部《关于政府采购支持监狱企业发展有关问题的通知》(财库〔2014〕68号)The Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Justice of the People's Republic of China issued the Notice on Government Procurement to Support the Development of Prison Enterprises (Cai Ku 〔2014〕 No. 68) /(Finance Exchequer〔2014〕No. 68)
党中央有关部门,国务院各部委、各直属机构,全国人大常 委会办公厅,全国政协办公厅,高法院,高检院,有关人民 团体,中央国家机关政府采购中心,中共中央直属机关采购 中心,全国人大机关采购中心,各省、自治区、直辖市、计 划单列市财政厅(局)、司法厅(局),新疆生产建设兵团 财务局、司法局、监狱管理局Relevant departments of the CPC Central Committee, ministries and commissions of the State Council, directly affiliated institutions, the General Office of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the General Office of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, relevant people's organizations, the Government Procurement Center of the Central State Organs, the Procurement Center of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the Procurement Center of the National People's Congress, the Department of Finance (Bureaus) and the Department of Justice (Bureaus) of all provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government and cities with independent planning status, the Finance Bureau, the Justice Bureau and the Prison Administration Bureau of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:
政府采购支持监狱和戒毒企业(以下简称监狱企业)发 展对稳定监狱企业生产,提高财政资金使用效益,为罪犯和 戒毒人员提供长期可靠的劳动岗位,提高罪犯和戒毒人员的 教育改造质量,减少重新违法犯罪,确保监狱、戒毒场所安 全稳定,促进社会和谐稳定具有十分重要的意义。为进一步 贯彻落实国务院《关于解决监狱企业困难的实施方案的通 知》(国发[2003]7 号)文件精神,发挥政府采购支持监狱企业发展的作用,现就有关事项通知如下Government procurement to support the development of prison and drug rehabilitation enterprises (hereinafter referred to as prison enterprises) is of great significance to stabilizing the production of prison enterprises, improving the efficiency of the use of fiscal funds, providing long-term and reliable jobs for criminals and drug rehabilitation personnel, improving the quality of education and transformation of criminals and drug rehabilitation personnel, reducing recidivism, ensuring the safety and stability of prisons and drug rehabilitation facilities, and promoting social harmony and stability. In order to further implement the spirit of the State Council's "Notice on the Implementation Plan for Solving the Difficulties of Prison Enterprises" (Guofa [2003] No. 7) and give full play to the role of government procurement in supporting the development of prison enterprises, the following matters are hereby notified:
一、监狱企业是指由司法部认定的为罪犯、戒毒人员提供生产项目和劳动对象,且全部产权属于司法部监狱管理局、戒毒管理局、直属煤矿管理局,各省、自治区、直辖市监狱管理局、戒毒管理局,各地(设区的市)监狱、强制隔离戒毒所、戒毒康复所,以及新疆生产建设兵团监狱管理局、戒毒管理局的企业。监狱企业参加政府采购活动时,应当提供由省级以上监狱管理局、戒毒管理局(含新疆生产建设兵团)出具的属于监狱企业的证明文件。I. Prison enterprises refer to enterprises that are identified by the Ministry of Justice as providing production projects and labor objects for criminals and drug addicts, and whose entire property rights belong to the Prison Administration Bureau, Drug Rehabilitation Bureau, and Coal Mine Administration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice, the Prison Administration Bureau and Drug Rehabilitation Bureau of each province, autonomous region, and municipality directly under the Central Government, prisons, compulsory isolation drug rehabilitation centers, and drug rehabilitation centers of various regions (districted cities), and the Prison Administration Bureau and Drug Rehabilitation Bureau of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. When participating in government procurement activities, prison enterprises shall provide certification documents issued by the Prison Administration Bureau and Drug Rehabilitation Bureau at or above the provincial level (including the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps) that they are prison enterprises.
二、在政府采购活动中,监狱企业视同小型、微型企业,享受预留份额、评审中价格扣除等政府采购促进中小企业发展的政府采购政策。向监狱企业采购的金额,计入面向中小企业采购的统计数据。II. In government procurement activities, prison enterprises are treated as small and micro enterprises and enjoy government procurement policies that promote the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, such as reserved quotas and price deductions during evaluation. The amount purchased from prison enterprises is included in the statistical data of procurement from small and medium-sized enterprises.
三、各地区、各部门要积极通过预留采购份额支持监狱企业。有制服采购项目的部门,应加强对政府采购预算和计划编制工作的统筹,预留本部门制服采购项目预算总额的30%以上,专门面向监狱企业采购。省级以上政府部门组织的公务员考试、招生考试、等级考试、资格考试的试卷印刷项目原则上应当在符合有关资质的监狱企业范围内采购。各地在免费教科书政府采购工作中,应当根据符合教科书印制资质的监狱企业情况,提出由监狱企业印刷的比例要求。III. All regions and departments should actively support prison enterprises by reserving purchase quotas. Departments with uniform procurement projects should strengthen the overall planning of government procurement budgets and plan compilation, and reserve more than 30% of the total budget of their department's uniform procurement projects for procurement specifically for prison enterprises. In principle, the examination paper printing projects for civil service examinations, admissions examinations, grade examinations, and qualification examinations organized by government departments at or above the provincial level should be purchased from prison enterprises that meet the relevant qualifications. In the government procurement of free textbooks, local governments should propose the proportion requirements for printing by prison enterprises based on the situation of prison enterprises that meet the qualifications for textbook printing.
四、各地区可以结合本地区实际,对监狱企业生产的办公用品、家具用具、车辆维修和提供的保养服务、消防设备 等,提出预留份额等政府采购支持措施,加大对监狱企业产品的采购力度。IV. Each region may, based on its local conditions, propose government procurement support measures such as reserving a share for office supplies, furniture and appliances, vehicle repair and maintenance services, fire-fighting equipment, etc. produced by prison enterprises, and increase procurement efforts for prison enterprise products.五、各地区、各部门要高度重视,加强组织管理和监督,做好政府采购支持监狱企业发展的相关工作。有关部门要加强监管,确保面向监狱企业采购的工作依法依规进行。各监狱企业要不断提高监狱企业产品的质量和服务水平,为做好监狱企业产品政府采购工作提供有力保障。V. All regions and departments should attach great importance to, strengthen organizational management and supervision, and do a good job in government procurement to support the development of prison enterprises. Relevant departments should strengthen supervision to ensure that procurement for prison enterprises is carried out in accordance with laws and regulations. All prison enterprises should continuously improve the quality and service level of prison enterprise products to provide strong guarantees for the government procurement of prison enterprise products.
中华人民共和国财政部Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China
中华人民共和国司法部Ministry of Justice of the People's Republic of China
2014 年 6 月 10 日10th June 2014
中国科学院武汉病毒研究所2020年度部门决算报告2020 Annual Financial Report of Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
中国科学院武汉病毒研究所于2024年3月1日发布的2020年度部门决算报告,原始链接(https://whiov.cas.cn/xxgk_160268/xxgk2023/202312/P020240301599632280960.pdf)的内容已经被删除。
北京军区联勤部和服务于中国共产党的核生化战争计划的中国人民解放军军事医学科学院发表的“病原微生物实验室实验操作产生气溶胶风险定量研究”论文
北京军区联勤部和服务于中国共产党的核生化战争计划的中国人民解放军军事医学科学院发表的“病原微生物实验室实验操作产生气溶胶风险定量研究”论文
The paper "Risk quantification of microbiological aerosol generated by experimental operations in pathogenic microbiology labs" published by the Joint Logistics Department of the Beijing Military Command and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, which serves the atomic or nuclear, biological and chemical(ABC) warfare plan of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP).
Chinese Communist Party tried to cover up problems of quality, corruption and flaws in relation to T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) resulting in casualties in target shooting test in Bangladesh
Li-Meng Yan and Lude Media revealed that Chinese Communist Party tried to cover up problems of quality, corruption and flaws in relation to T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) resulting in casualties in target shooting test in Bangladesh.
It is claimed by Dr Li-Meng YAN that they just obtained a top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from Central Military Commission of Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
On 5 May 2024, The newly delivered T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) to Bangladesh were tested in Chattogram for target shooting, resulting in casualties. The CCP and Bangladeshi militaries strictly blocked the news, involving the CCP's large-scale corruption of the military of the Belt and Road countries. Experts of People's Republic of China (PRC) are going to blame Pakistan-made ammunition for the accident, and cover-up the fatal flaws of Chinese T-59G tanks.
Here is the CCP's report translated by Dr Li-Meng Yan, with original contents in Chinese of Lude Media.
- On 5th May 2024, the expert team for Bangladesh T-59G tanks received a notice from the Bangladesh 902 workshop that during the tank shooting process, a personnel accident occurred in the Seventh Regiment of Bangladesh using the T-59G tanks delivered by us. The commander of one of the tanks, and a gunner suffered burns and one loader died.- Our expert team immediately reported to the relevant departments. On May 6, after receiving a notice from Bangladesh, the expert team and CCP’s Central Military Commission representative office, together with personnel from the Bangladesh Armor Bureau, took the flight to go to the Chittagong accident site.
On May 7, the Chinese on-site accident investigation team learned and reported the following situation:EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
We just obtained a top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 Central Military Commission.
1-n)
• On May 5, The newly delivered T- 59 modified tanks (T-59G) to Bangladesh were… https://t.co/kdmuZ5Q18f pic.twitter.com/UJAKslQLdH
1. The accident vehicle number is 260198. The vehicle is one of the fourth batch of vehicles recently delivered to Bangladesh (the fourth batch was delivered from March to April 2024, with a total of 30 tanks delivered to the foreign customer. - The vehicles were successively delivered to the troops for use in full compliance with the acceptance technical requirements.
- One of the users, the 7th Bangladesh Regiment, followed the original plan and immediately went to Chittagong for target practice after picking up four newly delivered tanks in early May).
- The vehicle fired a total of 60 rounds of ammunition before the accident.
1.1 Among them, 30 rounds of ammunition were fired during the tank acceptance (22 rounds armor-piercing, 7 rounds grenade, and 1 round high-explosive anti-tank. All ammunition types were supplied by us and passed the target shooting test).
1.2 The remaining 30 rounds were fired from May 1 to 4, all of which were armor-piercing rounds. The accidental ammunition was the 31st armor-piercing round fired this time and the fifth round fired that day.
- All ammunition for this shooting was produced by POF of Pakistan. Production date in 2022.
2. The accident occurred at around 2:40 pm on May 4, and operations such as loading ammunition before shooting were normal. The shooting uses the simple working mode and is fired manually.
- After firing, the gunpowder retreated normally, but about 152mm of the retrieval process was not completed, the gun bolt was not opened, and the cartridge case remained in the gun bore. The ammunition was fired forward and fell about 700-800 meters (it failed to reach the target range).
3. According to the description of the soldiers on site, in order to observe the ammunition loading position, Bangladesh side did not install an aluminum alloy protective plate on the right side. In addition, the initial pressure and final pressure of the gun were not checked before shooting.
4. After the shooting, the commander was burned, the gunner was burned, and the right chin of his face was shattered by the bolt body baffle flying out, and the bolt body baffle was deformed; the loader died and was burned, and the left half of his head was shattered by the baffle plate flying out.
- The source of the force that caused the bolt body baffle and gear plate to fly out and injure people cannot be determined at the scene and requires analysis by relevant domestic experts in China.
5. The on-site working group observed the inside of the vehicle body and found basically no traces of fire damage to the interior of the tank.
6. Some of the 125 armor-piercing bullets used by Bangladesh on the vehicle were seen at the scene (Bangladesh purchased them from Pakistan, which is cheaper).
- Except for a few cases of external water accumulation (it just rained on the morning of May 7), the ammunition is in a dry state. Desiccant, ammunition packaging, etc. are in good condition.
Bangladeshi attitude: The Bangladeshi side held an on-site meeting today, led by G1 (codename given by CCP), the first secretary of the Director of the Armor Bureau, CO and some officers of the 7th Regiment, the Chinese working group and our military agents were present.
- At the meeting, G1 stated that the inside of the tank should be a safe space isolated from the gun barrel. It is difficult to accept the casualties inside such a tank, and hoped that China would answer three questions:
1. The cause of the accident
2. Whether accident-related protective measures exist on the vehicle and why they are ineffective
3. Why the re-advancement was not completed.
- In addition, the Bangladeshi side did not complain about the Norinco Company during the entire investigation process. They just felt that the protective design of the Chinese T-59G vehicles was somewhat weak and could not effectively prevent personal injury in a vicious incident.
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
2-n) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
• Here is the 🇨🇳 report translated by me, with original contents in Chinese @lude_media
I. On May 7, the Chinese on-site… pic.twitter.com/fIC0nFyueP
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
3-n) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
III. Technical team work on site in Bangladesh
As soon as the accident occurred, Norinco’s First Department of Military… pic.twitter.com/Js9XQnBl7v
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
4-5) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
IV. Research results of domestic working groups and related manufacturers.
After one day of research, the Chinese domestic… pic.twitter.com/yIi0dqGXKH
EXCLUSIVE!
— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) May 9, 2024
5-5) Top classified document of “Briefing on the serious accident of Bangladesh T-59G tank during target shooting in the army” from 🇨🇳 CMC.
V. Report on the domestic processing situation in Norinco Company
1. Norinco’s regional department, quality department,… pic.twitter.com/C0aEQtzLVA
这个机密文件内容曝光,事件揭露,震动的是习的中共军委高层内部,他们知道这意味着什么。
— 路德社lude media (@lude_media) May 9, 2024
中共这批59改坦克炮管材料处理技术在西方制裁之后不过关,发射几十发炮弹就变形,导致漏气形成冲击波致死。而中共忽悠孟加拉军方推卸责任说是使用巴基斯坦的廉价炮弹原因。
真是可笑至极。 https://t.co/0oLrddXExp
中共交付孟加拉国的坦克发生严重事故,听起来像是炸膛了!而且没有安装防护板。有可能是火药质量问题,也有可能是火药里被放了炸药!总之我觉得中共的武器质量是不行的。🤣
— James (@JamesCa41543870) May 9, 2024
Le nouveau virus de type Ebola en provenance de la République populaire de Chine est-il une arme biologique ? Opinion de Li-Meng Yan
Le général XIA Xian-Zhu (夏咸柱) du Parti communiste chinois est le principal scientifique du nouveau projet de virus de type Ebola rapporté par . Bien que le général XIA utilise sa position dans les instituts de fusion militaro-civil pour publier des articles maintenant, il est le principal responsable des armes biologiques. expert en zoonoses et immunologie, au 11ème Institut (recherche vétéran) de l'Académie des Sciences Médicales Militaires (AMMS).
XIA est également académicien de l'Académie chinoise d'ingénierie (CAE), qui est le plus haut niveau d'académie de fusion militaro-civile en RPC, tandis qu'une autre est l'Académie chinoise des sciences (CAS). • Les preuves montrent que de nombreux universitaires du CAS et du CAS ont été profondément impliqués dans le développement du virus #COVID19 et dans la guerre de l'information qui y est associée (en particulier les faux récits d'origine naturelle et les données falsifiées).
Quelles autres nouvelles armes biologiques candidates ont été testées dans cette étude ? R : Outre le virus de type Ebola, les chercheurs du CCP-PLA ont également testé de nouveaux virus recombinants en utilisant les protéines GP du virus mortel Soudan et du virus Lassa dans cette étude. Bien que les taux de mortalité des deux autres nouveaux virus ne soient pas aussi « bons » que ceux du virus de type Ebola, cela ne signifie pas qu’ils cesseraient d’« améliorer » les autres virus pour en faire de nouvelles armes biologiques. • Conseils : Taux de létalité de ces virus de la fièvre hémorragique Virus Ebola : 25 à 90 % Virus du Soudan : 53 à 100 % Virus Lasso : 1 à 15 %
La protéine Ebola-GP appliquée dans le nouveau virus armé de la RPC a été étudiée à l'origine par des scientifiques dans le cadre d'un programme d'armes biologiques en Union soviétique dans les années 1990 ! • La protéine Ebola GP conçue dans le nouveau virus mortel de CCP-PLA est une protéine GP complète du virus Ebola (Genbank NO. AF086833.2). • Selon NIH GenBank, la protéine Ebola GP a été étudiée initialement et à plusieurs reprises par un groupe de scientifiques de l'institut des armes biologiques de l'URSS à Koltsovo, en Russie. • L'ancien directeur du projet d'armes biologiques de l'URSS, le Dr Kenneth Alibek, a confirmé que le laboratoire de vecteurs de Koltsovo est très dangereux, car il travaille sur des armes biologiques virales. • Q : POURQUOI les chercheurs du CCP-PLA se concentreraient-ils sur la même protéine Ebola GP ?
Étude du site de clivage de la furine et de la même protéine Ebola GP (Genbank NO. AF086833.2) • Voici quelques articles publiés dans les années 1990 par les chercheurs en armes biologiques de l'ancienne URSS du laboratoire Koltsovo Vector (V E Volchkov, V A Volchkova), liés au même Protéine Ebola-GP (NO. AF086833.2) dans le nouveau virus de type Ebola de la RPC. • Notamment, dans l'article intitulé « Traitement de la glycoprotéine du virus Ebola par la proprotéine convertase furine » en 1998, les chercheurs de l'ancienne URSS et leurs collègues allemands de l'époque se sont concentrés sur les fonctions du site de clivage de la furine (FCS) de cette protéine GP d'Ebola. • « (Ebola) GP est clivé par la proprotéine convertase furine. Ceci a été indiqué par l’observation selon laquelle le clivage ne s’est pas produit lorsque la GP était exprimée dans des cellules LoVo défectueuses en furine, mais qu’elle était restaurée dans ces cellules par la furine exprimée par un vecteur. • Par ailleurs, développer un vaccin est un prétexte courant pour la recherche sur les armes biologiques dans les régimes communistes. • Q : Est-ce une coïncidence si la même protéine Ebola GP est choisie par les experts en armes biologiques du CCP-PLA qui ont fabriqué le virus #COVID19 avec du FCS en laboratoire ?
La nouvelle est rapportée pour la première fois par Li-Meng Yan sur X.
Opinion of Michael Pettis on China's comparative advantage argument
"China denied generating overcapacity and accuses the EU of protectionism. Xi Jinping reiterated that position in talks with Macron, saying there is no capacity issue viewed from the perspective of comparative advantage or global market demand."
Xi is right to argue that overcapacity in any particular industry can simply be an expression of comparative advantage. In a well-functioning global trade environment, countries will indeed "overproduce" those products in which they have a comparative production advantage in order to exchange them for products in which they have a comparative production disadvantage. That causes total global production to rise, and is the main benefit of international trade.
But, as argued in a twitter thread posted five days ago, there are two important points that must be part of the trade discussion. These two points are often conflated, even though they are very separate.
In response to a question on Chinese overcapacity at a press conference, the Foreign Ministry's Lin Jian responded: "The “China overcapacity” accusation may look like an economic discussion, but the truth is, the accusation is built on false logic and ignores more than 200 years of the basic concept of comparative advantage in Western economics. All countries produce and export products of their comparative advantage and this is the nature of international trade." "If a country," he continues, "should be accused of overcapacity and asked to cut capacity whenever it produces more than its domestic demand, then what would countries trade with?" He's partly right. Trade should be based on comparative advantage, which means that countries must indeed produce more than they need of goods in which they have a comparative production advantage in order to exchange them for goods in which they don't. But this argument misses two important points. The first, and most obvious, is that comparative advantage can only be expressed in the exchange of goods. It would matter much less to the world if China were using its export revenues to import from the rest of the world. But it's not. China's competitiveness (very different from comparative advantage) is based on transfers from the household sector that leave Chinese demand too weak to absorb Chinese production. The purpose of China's trade surplus is to shift this weak demand abroad. The second point is that natural or permanent comparative advantage is very rare. In reality countries implement trade and industrial policies in order to create comparative advantage. There's nothing wrong with that. Its the whole point of trade and industrial policies. But this also means that if a country implements trade and industrial policies that create comparative advantage in a strategically important industry, other countries can regain comparative advantage in that industry by implementing their own trade and industrial policies. Lin Jian is right to say that "all countries produce and export products of their comparative advantage and this is the nature of international trade," but this doesn't mean comparative advantage is consistent with running permanent surpluses to resolve weak domestic demand, nor does it mean that other countries cannot implement trade and industrial policies designed to regain comparative advantage in those same industries. Comparative advantage is constantly fought over. That's almost the definition of economic development.
First, comparative advantage is almost always driven by trade and industrial policies designed to help a country dominate strategically important industries. This means it is a dynamic process, and there is no reason why, once it has been achieved by one country, other countries may not also implement similar trade and industrial policies to regain comparative advantage if they too believe the industry is strategically important. That is the whole point of trade and industrial policy.
Second, comparative advantage is expressed in the exchange of goods, and not in their production. Exporting goods without importing isn't an expression of comparative advantage. It is just how countries export excess savings and externalize the costs of weak domestic demand.
Yesterday Ursula von der Leyen said "For trade to be fair, access to each other’s market also needs to be reciprocal." If there weren't the problem of excess savings, access to each other's market would indeed be part of any resolution of trade disputes.
But the overall problem for China's trade partners isn't lack of access. It is China's persistent excess savings, driven by distortions in domestic income distribution. This is what China's trade partners must absorb.