14 August 2026

The Architect of Technological Coercion: How Delegate Xin Yi Weaponizes Military-Civil Fusion Through the Legislative Assembly


2018年3月12日上午,中共中央军委主席习近平出席十三届全国人大一次会议共产党武装部队代表团全体会议时,中共中央军委科学技术委员会副主任辛毅作为全国人大代表表示:作为国防科技工作者,不仅要做好学习理解习近平“要加强国防科技创新,加快建设军民融合创新体系。”重要指示的“上篇文章”,也要做好贯彻落实的“下篇文章”。

一是在国防科技创新布局上,把基础研究应用放在重要地位,放到国家科技规划中统筹安排,做到知其然还要知其所以然,为国防科技创新奠定坚实基础。

二是努力构建军民融合的国防科技创新体系,在政策制度、规划计划、科研力量等具体工作中,拆除制约融合的“隔离墙”,捅破阻碍融合的“窗户纸”,使“军”和“民”真正融在一起。

三是抓好重点领域军民科技协同创新,推动重大科技项目一体论证和实施,充分发挥社会主义制度集中力量办大事的优势,像当年抓“两弹一星”那样,把重点领域军民科技协同创新作为推进军民融合的突破口,把军民融合体制机制立起来,把政策法规定下来,走开军民融合深度发展的创新之路。

2018年3月十三届全国人大一次会议结束后在接受中共党媒的军事记者采访时中共中央军委科学技术委员会副主任辛毅表示中央军委科学技术委员会和国家科技部2017年8月出台《“十三五”科技军民融合发展专项规划》是“落实习主席关于国防科技创新系列重要指示的实际举措,是对“十三五”期间推进科技军民融合发展的顶层设计和战略布局,为国家和军队有关部门指导科技军民融合发展工作、制定相关政策提供了基本依据和方向指南”。

Western policy analysts frequently mischaracterize the National Soviet Assembly of Communist China as a non-operational talk shop. Yet, examining the dual role of active-duty generals like Lieutenant General Xin Yi—Deputy Director of the Science and Technology Commission of the Central Military Commission of the Chinese Communist Party and military delegate to the 13th National Soviet Assembly—reveals how the regime uses its supreme legislative organ to engine-room defense technology acquisition, forcibly integrate civilian research, and undermine global technological security.

Xin Yi’s public statements during and after the assembly’s military delegation meetings provide an explicit roadmap of how the party-state leverages legislative mechanisms to execute state-directed technological absorption.

Breaking Down the “Isolation Walls”: Totalitarian Research Extraction

In his address during the 13th National Soviet Assembly, Xin Yi articulated three uncompromising directives for restructuring national science and technology:

Siphoning State Basic Research for Defense: Xin explicitly demanded that military fundamental research be integrated directly into national science and technology planning, ensuring that civilian scientific budgets directly underwrite military capabilities.

Tearing Down Civilian-Military Barriers: Xin called to “dismantle the isolation walls” and “puncture the paper window panes” restricting integration, advocating for the complete elimination of regulatory, institutional, and policy boundaries between civilian academia and the defense sector.

Replicating the “Two Bombs, One Satellite” Mobilization: Citing the regime’s historic nuclear and space weapons programs, Xin demanded a state-directed, command-economy mobilization of national resources, establishing binding policies and statutes to force military-civil technological synergy across critical dual-use domains.

Institutionalizing Military-Civil Fusion (MCF) via Legislative Mandates

Xin Yi does not merely advocate for these policies in theory; he holds the executive and legislative authority to enforce them. As Deputy Director of the Science and Technology Commission, Xin co-authored the 13th Five-Year Special Plan for Science and Technology Military-Civil Fusion Development alongside the Ministry of Science and Technology.

By holding a seat in the National Soviet Assembly of Communist China, active-duty commanders like Xin Yi convert military acquisition demands directly into binding national policy. When Xin publicly celebrated the unanimous assembly vote securing Xi Jinping’s continued tenure, he was affirming the ideological alignment between top military command, state law, and the total militarization of civilian technological innovation.

Strategic Implications for Western Academic and Tech Sectors

Xin Yi’s legislative dual-role highlights the grave risks posed to international research institutions, Western universities, and global tech firms:

The Illusion of “Civilian” Research Partners: Under the strategy mandated by delegates like Xin Yi, there is no purely “civilian” academic institution or technology enterprise in Communist China. Any foreign venture sharing dual-use technology with Chinese universities or private firms directly feeds into the Central Military Commission’s innovation pipeline.

Legislatively Coerced Tech Transfer: Through legal frameworks passed under the umbrella of Military-Civil Fusion, the regime codifies mandatory data-sharing, research co-optation, and defense prioritization for all domestic technological advancements.

The Bottom Line

Active-duty military delegates like Lt. Gen. Xin Yi demonstrate that the assembly is not a passive audience—it is an operational platform where defense commanders codify military strategy into state law. By utilizing legislative power to mandate Military-Civil Fusion, the Chinese Communist Party ensures that every advancement in civilian science is systematically converted into a weapon of state power.

#Democracy #Christ #Peace #Freedom #Liberty #Humanrights #人权 #法治 #宪政 #独立审计 #司法独立 #独立自治

No comments:

Post a Comment

糯米团推文⬜️ Tweets of @NUOMT

Tweets of CPA Jim